Wednesday, August 4, 2010

POST 0018

SAME TIME & PLACE AS POST 0017

ABBAS commented on the then upcoming PHILIPPINE ELECTIONS 2010:

-------START OF COPIED ARTICLE/COMMENTARY-------
September 2, 2009
Noynoy, the Anointed and the Philippine political class | Current

events, Media Studies, Socio-Political, Philipine Elections

jamalashley @ 3:17 pm

The media, especially the Lopez-owned ABS-CBN, made sure that all

Filipinos would read about, listen and/or watch the Cory Aquino

wake and funeral rites. While watching the seemingly endless media

coverage of the affair, I realized that there are only TWO groups

in the Philippine political class today - the Marcos group and the

Aquino group. All of them were "made" either by Marcos or Aquino or

their cronies. Those who (or whose family) came before Marcos time

re-entered the political class through either Marcos or Cory.

There were, of course, exceptions. They came from nowhere. Manny

Villar came to the political scene by way of becoming a

billionaire. Noli de Castro came via the TV/radio media.

AGENDA-SETTING

The unheard of news coverage (which is still on-going) of Cory's

death evidently points to an agenda by media.

The media trumpeted that Cory's death supposedly buried Cha-Cha

(Charter Change). Later, they built up Cory's son, Noynoy as the

anointed, a veritable new Messiah.

The Lopezes, who own the ABS-CBN network, owed practically

everything to Cory. Cory gave them back ABS-CBN lock, stock and

barrel and even more.

The leading newspaper, the Philippine Daily Inquirer, had a bad

experience with Joseph Estrada, who is planning a comeback.

The second leading newspaper, the Philippine Star, has always been

pro-Cory.

AQUINO GROUP UNITED

The power of the media is now proven with the unity of the Aquino

group. The Aquino political class has closed ranks behind Benigno

Aquino III or Noynoy, the lackluster son of Ninoy and Cory Aquino.

Mar Roxas, the Liberal Party standard bearer, was forced to take a

back seat to the Anointed. Roxas's fiancee, TV/radio broadcaster

Korina Sanchez, must be fuming. Incidentally, Sanchez was

supposedly romantically linked to Noynoy before Mar.

MARCOS GROUP SCATTERED

While the Aquino political class has united, the Marcos political

class is still divided. The patriarchs of the group are former

President Joseph "Erap" Estrada and his 1992 presidential running

mate, Eduardo "Danding" Cojuangco, Cory's first cousin.

Erap still dreams of becoming president again. Danding has two

surrogates - Chiz Escudero and his nephew, Gilbert Teodoro.

Teodoro is trying to get the nod of the ruling party, Gloria

Macapagal-Arroyo's Lakas-Kampi-CMD.

By definition (as mentioned above), GMA belongs to the Aquino

group. But because of circumstances, she is now the Aquino group's

Public Enemy No. 1.

To unite the Marcos group, Chiz should unite with Erap. An Erap-

Chiz tandem would be a match to the Noynoy-Mar team-up. Noynoy

should team-up with Mar. It is the gentlemanly thing to do. But for

pragmatic reasons, the group would probably get another guy. They

should not get one from their group, like Makati kingpin Jejomar

Binay. It would be better if they get somebody from the Marcos

political class like Senator Richard Gordon. Or, they could get

Supreme Court Chief Justice Puno, who is waging a "morality"

campaign, whatever that means.

NOT LIKE THEIR FATHERS

I truly feel sorry for both Mar and Noynoy. They are not their

fathers yet their families/clans expect them to follow their

fathers' footsteps. Mar is not Gerry and Noynoy is almost the

opposite of Ninoy.

As a child and a young man, I had great respect and admiration for

Gerry Roxas and Ninoy Aquino. Unfortunately, I think their sons did

not get their fathers' charismatic charms.

THE ODD MEN OUT

Villar and de Castro do not belong to either political class. The

two can team up but they will lack the political clout or the so-

called "command votes" enjoyed by members of the political class.

Villar's Nacionalista Party has very few members.

De Castro is still weighing his options. He could either join GMA's

or Villar's party.

GMA AGENDA

Whatever GMA's agenda is, her party should get a fairly popular

president. Teodoro and Bayani Fernando come last in all surveys on

presidential candidates. On the other hand, the Vice President is a

very popular fellow. He can give the very popular Estrada a run for

his money. Their constituencies belong to the lower classes - C,D

and E. And that is where most of the Philippine populace belong.

A Noli de Castro - Gilbert Teodoro tandem would do well for

Gloria's party.

If everyone play their cards well, the 2010 presidential elections

could be very interesting.

Comments (1)
August 5, 2009
Ramos-Horta and Macapagal-Arroyo in Aquino wake / funeral mass |

Current events, Socio-Political jamalashley @ 10:10 am

I was watching the TV coverage of the funeral mass for the former

President Corazon C. Aquino. Shortly before the mass began, former

anchor of Tagalog-language TV news programs and now Vice President

of the Philippine Republic Noli de Castro arrived. He was quite in

a hurry to go to his seat as if afraid that he would not get to sit

in the front rows. When he arrived at the proper row, he was

greeted by former Philippine President Fidel V. Ramos. Ramos

introduced him to East Timor President and Nobel Peace Prize

laureate Jose Ramos-Horta. De Castro did not seem to give much

attention to Mr. Ramos-Horta. He seemed to be concerned only with

finding his seat. And suddenly, he pushed aside ”with his two

hands" the East Timor President so he (de Castro) could sit next to

ex-President Fidel Ramos.

I couldn't believe my eyes! I asked my companion if she saw what De

Castro did. Yes she did. So, I thought that maybe it was not

Ramos-Horta. Maybe it was just his (Ramos-Horta's) aide.

A few minutes later, Ramos-Horta was shown entering his limousine

and leaving the Manila Cathedral. The news anchors did not know why

Ramos-Horta was leaving. And when the cameras went back to show

Fidel Ramos and De Castro, there was noone seated next to the Vice

President.

Why would anybody go through all the trouble of attending a funeral

in another country and leave just before the mass begins?

How I wish I had TIVO so I could just rewind and verify if it was

indeed Ramos-Horta who was unceremoniously shoved aside by Noli de

Castro.

PRESENCE / ABSENCE OF ARROYO

President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo went to the wake of former

President Aquino early morning today. Only one child of the former

president was there to greet her. She sat near Senator Noynoy

Aquino for some 10 minutes and left. She will not be attending the

funeral.

I think Arroyo's advisers got it all wrong. Arroyo should not have

come for the wake because wakes are usually for friends and

relatives, of which she was neither. She should have come for the

funeral proper as it would be more politically-correct. It is only

proper that a sitting president would attend the funeral of a

former president, especially a former superior. Ms. Arroyo was

appointed as Assistant Secretary and later Undersecretary at the

DTI by then President Aquino. It was at the Department of Trade and

Industry that Ms. Arroyo started making her fortune.

I was at the funeral of the late Senator Benigno "Ninoy" Aquino,

President Aquino's husband. I joined the very long caravan from

Sto. Domingo Church to the Memorial Park. We left the church around

9 or 10 a.m. and reached the memorial park some 11 hours later.

That was an experience.

But this time, I pass.

Comments (0)
June 8, 2009
BANGSA MORO STRUGGLE | History, Socio-Political, Bangsa Moro,

Moroland, Religious/Cultural, Islam jamalashley @ 11:10 pm

In my post The Bangsa Moro is an International Concern, a reader,

DATUAN SOLAIMAN PANOLIMBA (datuan.panolimba@yahoo.com) wrote a

rather long "comment". Because of its length, I am instead

publishing it in this post.

=================================

ARMED STRUGGLE OF THE BANGSAMORO MUSLIMS IN THE PHILIPPINES:

Written by: DATUAN SOLAIMAN PANOLIMBA-
North Cotabato, Philippines

Bismillaher Rahmaner Raheem. Asalamo Alaykum Warahmatullahi

Wabarakatuho.

The Bangsamoro Muslims of Mindanao and its islands have fought the

longest and bloodiest struggle in the entire history of mankind in

the world which extends to about four hundred eighty seven (487)

years already up to this writing. First, the Bangsamoro people

fought, without let up, against the Spanish colonial power for 377

years from 1521 to 1898. Second, they fought a bloody war against

the American imperialist from 1898 up to 1946.And third, they are

still fighting against the Philippine neo-colonial power from 1946

up to the present.

In fact the present JIHAD FIY SABILILLAH waged by the Bangsamoro

people is a continuation of the struggle which had been fought by

their ancestors and forebears demanding for freedom and

independence. The 487-year war which has been fought by the

Bangsamoro is replete with historical facts.

But what is surprising is despite of the long period of war being

fought for; the Bangsamoro people are still engaged in a war for

freedom and independence. The struggle which has been fought by the

Bangsamoro in four hundred eighty seven years (487) had extensively

covered by the Muslim historians and authors in their books such as

Dr. Cesar Adib Majul in his Muslims in the Philippines, 1973,

Manila, Philippines, Dr. Alunan C. Glang in Muslim Secession or

Integration, 1969, Quezon City, Philippines, and Salah Jubair in

Bangsamoro: A Nation Under Endless Tyranny, 1997, Lahore, Pakistan.

THE FIRST MORO WAR:

After securing the friendship with Rajah Humabon of Cebu, Ferdinand

Magellan, who led the Spanish colonial adventure in the Far East,

invaded the small kingdom of Mactan in 1521. The island was then

ruled by Rajah Lapu-Lapu who did not want to be a friend of foreign

colonizer.

It can be noted, therefore, that Visayas before was believed under

the influence if not one of the principalities controlled by the

Moro Sultanate of Sulu or Maguindanao at that early period of time.

See Map of Moro Sultanate, principalities and areas in Luzon,

Visayas and Mindanao at the time of the arrival of Spaniards in

1521. (Source: London Library and Museum). Unfortunately, Magellan

died in action on April 27, 1521 that drove the Spaniards back to

the West and by such incident, they had narrated their fiasco under

the hands of the native inhabitants.

Thus, Lapu_Lapu stood as the first native chieftain who fought

against foreign attempt to colonize the Moro homeland.
The Spanish dream had yet started so that in 1522, with Captain

Sebastian Del Cano at the head of the Spanish survivors, Spain

became the first circumnavigator of the globe as declared.

SPAIN'S AGGRESSION:

Crown Prince Felipe, known as King Philip II of Spain, directed

Captain Miguel Lopez de Legaspi, the viceroy of Mexico, to go to

the Philippine island and to make it a permanent Spanish colony. He

landed at Cebu where he had established the first Spanish

settlement in 1565. In 1569, he proceeded to Panay where a second

Spanish settlement was created.

After quelling some minor resistances staged by the native

inhabitants, he sent Captain Martin de Goiti to Luzon, particularly

in Manila where a well-fortified Moro principality was located. It

was ruled by Rajah Solaiman and assisted by Rajah Matanda. Tondo

then was ruled by Rajah Lakandula. Records has showed that these

Manila chieftains where of Bornean origin. In fact, their

relationship with the Sultan of Borneo was categorized as very

close to each other.

Rajah Solaiman who led the fight for freedom and independence,

declared to the foreign aggressors the following words: "WE WISH TO

BE THEN FRIENDS OF ALL NATIONS. BUT THEY MUST UNDERSTAND THAT WE

CANNOT TOLERATE ANY ABUSE. ON THE CONTRARY, WE WILL REPAY WITH

DEATH THE LEAST THING THAT TOUCHES OUR HONOR." Unfortunately, on

June 3, 1571, Rajah Solaiman perished at the historic Battle of

Bangkusay, a place off the coast of Tondo, but he left with a

patriotic landmark in his defense of freedom and independence of

the country. The next to fall, despite of a fierce defense by the

native inhabitants, was the Muslim principality of Mindoro in 1574.

Then came the short-lived Magat Salamat Uprising in 1587. Emerging

victorious over the pockets of resistance were the Spanish

conquistadors. So that within a span of 11years, they were able to

overlord the territory of Luzon and Visayas. Legaspi, who was

appointed as the first Governor-General, had made Manila as the

seat of Spanish colony in Luzon and Visayas, which was collectively

called as "Filipinas" or "Philippine Islands" eventually.

Salah Jubair succinctly wrote “it is necessary to clarify,

contrary to popular perception, two important points in history:

Firstly, the first group of people whom the Spaniards in 1570

called "Moros" were those in Manila and environs and not the

Islamized natives in Mindanao and Sulu and secondly, the first

Moro-Spanish War was not fought in Mindanao and Sulu but right in

what is Metropolitan Manila.

THE MORO-SPANISH WAR:

The 377 year of Moro-Spanish War represents an uninterrupted bloody

war which had been fought by the Moros against the Spaniard's

attempt to subjugate them as a people. At first, the Spaniards

thought that Borneo was more of a threat to the Manila colony than

the Muslims of Mindanao and Sulu. So they invaded Borneo in 1578.

However, after their Bornean expedition, the Spaniards had turned

their eyes on the Moros in the South, particularly, Sulu which they

were suspecting of having an alliance with the Borneans.

The Spanish colony towards the Moros was basically spelled out in

the instructions of Governor-General Francisco de Sande to Captain

Esteban Rodriguez de Figueroa in May of 1578. Figueroa was

officially commissioned to subdue the Moro Sultanate of Mindanao

and Sulu.

It was clear then from the instructions given to him, Spain sought

to achieve two things with respect to the Moros of Mindanao namely:
1. Get them to acknowledge Spanish sovereignty over their

territory.

2. Promote trade with them, limiting their trade to the Philippine

islands and exploring natural resources of Moro land with a view to

their commercial exploitations.

3. Bring an end to Moro "piracy" against Spanish shipping, and an

end to Moro raids on the Christianized settlements of the Visayas

and Southern Luzon. 4. Hispanize and Christianize the Moros, along

the same lines followed with respect to other lowland Filipino

(Indio) groups.

According to Dr Peter G. Gowing, the last line Spanish policy was

the reason if not the root of the Moro's fierce resistance to the

Spaniards and their Christianized Filipino allies. Capt. Figueroa

was instructed to order the Moro chief not to admit any more

"preachers of the doctrine of Mahomet since it is evil and false,

and that of the Christianity alone is good." Addressing himself to

the "Lord of Mindanao," the instruction includes: "You shall tell

him that our object is that he be converted to Christianity and

that he must allow us freely to preach the law of the Christians,

and the natives must be allowed to go and hear the preaching and to

be converted, without receiving any harm from the chiefs."

Furthermore, Figueroa was instructed to ascertain who the preachers

of Islam were so that they can be arrested and brought them before

the Governor-general. He was also commanded to destroy any Masjeed

he found "where that accursed doctrine has been preached and you

shall order that it be not be rebuilt." As he was instructed to

meet force with force and to punish the Moros as he deemed best

taking special care not to trust them..., the Moros responded to

such designs with violence and warfare. In 1596, during the initial

Spanish campaign in Buhayan (Buayan) in the heart of Mindanao,

Figueroa met his disastrous defeat.

The erstwhile Spanish conquistador suffered death at the hands of

the Moro warriors led by Datu Ubal (Mangubal in Moro tradition).

The initial Spanish campaign in Mindanao had ignited and caused the

series of bloody encounters between the Moros and the Spaniards, in

which,it was carried up to the coming of the Americans in 1899.

MORO WARS:

In retaliation to the Spanish cruelty, the Moros had carried out

the war to the Spanish settlements in Luzon and Visayas. In 1599

led by Datu Sirongan and Datu Salikula of Mindanao, the Moros

raided the northern islands and return home with rich war booty

including several captives. The Moro actions had created fear and

anxiety among the Spanish and Filipino settlements in Luzon and

Visayas.

In succeeding years, the Moro buccaneers harassed Spanish shipping,

and so were dubbed "pirates". But to the Moros they believed they

were fighting a war in defense of freedom and independence. Thus,

Sultan Kudarat I, after his ascension to power to the Sultanate of

Mindanao in 1619, declared a Jihad against Spain whom he had

emboldened more than ever the Moros to fight for home, country and

Islam. Their expeditions carried Jihad to the coasts of Visayas and

Luzon.

From then on, the Moro war vessels periodically raided, killed and

plunders Spanish settlements. Thus, it was dubbed really a bloody

war. The Spaniards counter move was seen in their series of

punitive expeditions against the Moros. The expeditions were made

up of Spanish-led Christian Filipino forces. Which eventually, the

Spaniards had succeeded to establish forts in Moro homeland,

however, their colonies were only confined inside their fortified

garrisons. They failed to subdue the Moros who were periodically

attacking their forts.

From the 18th up to the 19th centuries of Spanish successive

engagement in the "Moro Wars", it was never followed by effective

and permanent occupation of the Bangsamoro ancestral homeland. The

American historian Dr. Najeeb Saleeby rightly observed that "the

Moros fought for home and country, for freedom to pursue their

religion and way of life, and for liberty to rove the seas

whichever they would." For over 300 years, they had made a shamble

of Spain's Moro policy.

Even with the importation of Spanish war vessels in the middle of

the 19th century did not stop the Moro raids of Spanish and

Filipino settlements of Visayas and Luzon. Despite of being

guerilla fighters, the Moro exacted a heavy toll of casualties,

however, when entrenched in their "cota" (fort) they simply could

not be rooted out.

When situation demanded they would have readily killed their

wounded and gave no quarter to the Spanish and Christian Filipino

enemy. They fought ferociously, and their usual tactic was to wear

down the attackers, obliging them eventually to withdraw. At the

close of the 19th century, the Spanish colonial power in Luzon and

Visayas was threatened by the Filipino Revolution of 1896 and the

coming of the American colonial power in 1898.

Subsequently, the Treaty of Paris was concluded on December 10,

1898 between the United States of America and Spain wherein the

latter had ceded to the Americans her former colony in Mexico,

Honolulu and the Philippine Islands with the amount of $20 million.

With this treaty, the Spaniards abandoned their colony in the north

by virtue of the Treaty of Paris. So that the Moros of the south

remained a free and independent people. Thus, they were not

subjugated by their conquistadors.

AMERICAN AGGRESSION:

The Bangsamoro people of Mindanao were already enjoying freedom and

independence when the Filipinos declared a revolution against Spain

in 1896. When the Americans arrived in the Philippine islands in

1898, the Philippine Revolution was already in progress in Luzon

and Visayas. The so called "Spanish-American war" was also nearing

its end.

For instance, Commodore George Dewey, commanding the American naval

flotilla, defeated the Spanish Pacific Squadron during "Battle of

Manila Bay" on May 1, 1898. Subsequently, the United States of

America assumed the authority in the Philippine Islands by virtue

of the Treaty of Paris on December 10, 1898. But the Filipinos, who

declared the independence of the First Philippine Republic on June

1, 1898, had to fight a new imperialist power.

Maverick as it was, the Americans sought the forging of the Bates-

Kiram Agreement on August 20, 1899 with a view to neutralizing the

Moros of the south while they were still engaging the forces of

President Emilio Aguinaldo in the north.

After three years of Filipino-American war, the Americans were able

to crush the Philippine revolution and declared a general amnesty

in 1902. The Americans, after having a unilateral abrogation of the

Bates-Kiram Agreement, had now turn their eyes to the Moros of

Mindanao.

In May 1899, the first US Army contingent landed in Jolo, Sulu. The

US troops had also occupied Zamboanga on November 16 and followed

the Cotabato areas in December. This began the American occupation

of Mindanao which ended in May 1920 when the Department of Mindanao

and Sulu was abolished as a government unit.

MORO-AMERICAN WAR:

For all practical reasons, the American occupation of the Moro land

was a direct affront to the freedom and independence of the Moros.

The lesson from the Spanish policy of subjugation was still fresh

in the minds and hearts of the Moros. With the Americans, the Moros

have had similar views, as a threat, and a change of colonial

master which had the same intention with that of their predecessor,

that is, to subjugate them as a people.

Thus trouble had erupted as early as May 1899. But this time, the

next generation of Moros took the cudgel. Soon various

confrontations flared up in Mindanao and Sulu. This led J. Ralston

Hayden, an American writer, to note that "never during the entire

continental expansion of the United States had armed encounters

been as frequent and serious as that between the Moros and American

troops."

The Moros' determination to defend their religion and country had

prompted the American colonizers to comment that "THE ONLY GOOD

MORO IS A DEAD MORO." Record has showed that there were at least

20,000 Moros who were killed in action from 1899 to 1916. From 1904

to 1906 alone, the Moros suffered about 3,000 killed as against 70

Americans.

Large-scale engagements were recorded between the American troops

and the Moro warriors in several parts of Mindanao and Sulu from

1902 to 1935. The most serious were those staged by Panglima

Hassan, Datu Ali, Datu Ampuan Agaus and Jikiri.

Shortly after the establishment of the Philippine Commonwealth

Government on November 15, 1935 with Manuel L. Quezon as the first

President, the Moros had viewed it as the transfer of colonial

government to a new master. It could be noted, therefore, that

Mindanao and Sulu were forcefully annexed to the Commonwealth

government. Again, the Moros rose in arms in defense of their

freedom and independence.

The most serious armed rebellion that took place in Mindanao was

happened in June 1936. It was spearheaded by Hadji Abdulhamid

Bungabong of Unayan, Lanao del Sur and lasted for several years.

The Moros fought gallantry and heroically in a series of wars

called "COTA WARS". The grievances were contained in a petition

letter sent to the President of the United States of America. The

issues presented were:

1. Moros had become second class citizens.

2. The Moro Province be segregated once independence is given to

the Filipinos.

3. Acquisition of lands in the Moro Province be reserved for the

Moros.

4. Islam must not be curtailed in any manner.

The uprising lasted until the dawning of the Japanese interregnums

in 1941. The Moros were once again caught in the crossfire between

two colonial masters. But now between the Americans and the

Japanese which saw its peak from 1942 to 1945.

PARLIAMENTARY STRUGGLE:

In 1946 it saw the final annexation of the Moro land to the new

Philippine Republic. Historians, in the likes of Salah Jubair, have

succinctly observed that "The U.S. colonial government and the

succeeding Filipino neo-colonial power have utterly failed to stamp

out Moro resistance. But they have succeeded in rendering the Moro

traditional power structure effete and almost obsolete."

"The main casualties were the sultans and datus, whose authority

had been squelched to the extent, that they had become mere symbols

of the past and mute relics of history," he pointed out. "The

sultan-people direct dealing," he continued "has been almost

severed and , to get rid of the evils of dual rule, meaning sultan

and government ruling simultaneously, the Commonwealth government

directed all state-installed officials in 1936 to take over the

roles so far exercised by the sultans and datus."

Elaborating that the disintegration of the traditional socio-

political order and the ever-tightening imposition of the secular-

materialistic concept of life bequeathed by the Americans, Salah

Jubair said that it has created an extensively difficult situation

for the Moros. Consequently, those who were won over to the

American side, freely or under duress, were the ones who with their

pens, slogans and orations adopted and pursued the parliamentary or

unarmed way of struggle.

These crops of Moro intellectuals asked the United States

government to separate the Moro Province, either as colony or as

independent state. Singly or in chorus, they unanimously refused to

join the Filipinos in their demand for independence. It was true

that they did not succeed, neither did they achieve anything of

consequence in terms of the real liberation of the Moros-that

obviously, was already fore doomed from the start.

But there is no gain slaying the fact that they did their best in

their own way. Yet, on the other hand, by following the unarmed way

of struggle, they were deeply entangled into the Americans cobweb

and continued to become subservient to the whims and caprices of

the new colonial masters.

Failing to achieve their aspiration to be free and independent

during the American colonial days, the Moro parliamentary struggle

dragged to the post-war Philippine administrations. Couple with

some isolated disturbances, armed clashes between Moro warriors and

government troops were reported in various parts of Mindanao.

The off-and-on armed skirmishes continued to plague the countryside

in open defiance of government authorities. Whatever it may said

about the post-war pocket uprisings in Mindanao and Sulu, it could

be attributed to the fact that the Moros have never abandoned their

desire to be free and independent from the clutches of neo-

colonialism in their sacred and ancestral homeland. Nurtured by

socio-cultural discrimination, the most known of these uprisings

were those led by Kamlon Hajji, Abdulmajid Panondiongan, Tawantawan

and Hadjal Uh. It took billions of pesos from the national coffers

in quelling these insurrections.

Such that amid cries of national neglect and apathy, Congressman

Ombra Amilbangsa of Sulu Province had gone to extent of sponsoring

a bill in Philippine Congress in 1961 which sought to declare the

independence of the Province of Sulu from the Philippine Republic.

The Moro solon was disgusted by the chronic ills and inequities

prevalent in the Philippine society where the Moros were the direct

victims. His bill did not merit the attention of his colleagues in

Congress and his move was simply dismissed as a "drama or

attention-calling."

MORO STRUGGLE CONTINUED:

In 1968, the then Governor Datu Udtog Matalam of the empire

Cotabato Province created the Mindanao Independence Movement (MIM)

seeking the separation of Mindanao, Sulu, Basilan, Tawitawi and

Palawan from the Republic of the Philippines and to establish an

Islamic State in the sacred and ancestral homeland of the

Bangsamoro people. But the dream and aspiration of the grand old

man of Cotabato failed.

Finally in 1972, the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and its

military wings, the Bangsamoro Army led by Prof. Nur Misuari went

public declaring armed struggle as its principal instrument in the

formation of a Bangsamoro Republik encompassing Mindanao, Sulu,

Basilan, Tawitawi and Palawan. It sought to liberate Moro people

and homeland from Philippine colonialism.

The reverberating sounds of the firearms and mortars of the

Bangsamoro Revolution led by the Moro National Liberation Front

(MNLF) pressured the Philippine government under the then dictator

President Ferdinand Marcos to entered into an agreement with the

MNLF leadership in December 23, 1976. The agreement was known as

"Tripoli Agreement of 1976." It sought to establish an autonomous

government for Muslims in South of the Philippines under its

sovereignty and territorial integrity. But Pres. Marcos grossly

violated the letter and spirit of the entire agreement.

When President Corazon (Cory) Aquino catapulted to the Philippine

presidency in 1986 because of the Peoples Power Revolution against

Pres. Marcos, she created the Autonomous Region Muslim Mindanao

(ARMM), but still failed to finally solved the Bangsamoro problem

in Mindanao and its islands.

Until in 1992, when President Fidel V. Ramos became president of

the Philippines after President Cory Aquino, his government

negotiated with the MNLF leadership which resulted to the creation

of Southern Philippine Council for Peace and Development (SPCPD) on

September 2, 1996. But still the Bangsamoro dream of freedom and

independence became more obscure. It was because of the fact that

all agreements entered by and between the MNLF and GRP are only a

showpiece of the Philippine government in order to smokescreen the

oppression, colonization, exploitation and extermination of the

Bangsamoro people. This regional set-up of government is nothing

but an adjunct of the Filipino colonial government. It is being

used by the Philippine government to further fortify the Filipino

colonialism over the Bangsamoro people and their ancestral

homeland.

So that when the MNLF leadership compromised the liberty and

independence of the Bangsamoro people in December 1976, the Moro

Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), chaired by the late Ameril

Mujahideen Ustadz Salamat Hashim went public assuming and leading

the JIHAD FIY SABILILLAH of the Bangsamoro people for final

liberation, freedom and independence, ALLAH SUBHANAHO WA'TAALA.

Late Ustadz Salamat Hashim, then Ameril Mujahideen and Chairman,

Central Committee of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) said

and we quote, "Any solution less than full independence of the

Bangsamoro people will not work. Past experiences since the be-
ginning of the annexation of the Bangsamoro homeland to the

Philippines in 1935, have proven that the Bangsamoro Muslims could

not live a normal life under a corrupt and secular government and

that the two nations, the Bangsamoros and the Filipinos, could not

get along with each other because of their distinct religions,

customs and traditions. It will be for the best interests of the

Bangsamoros and the Filipinos if both are free" and quote.

Wasalamu Alaykum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuho.
-------END OF COPIED MATERIAL-------

LASTLY:
THE TAGALOG REVOLUTION of 1896 is only one aspect of a much

bigger/wider story of this ARCHIPELAGO. Note the remarks RE HISTORY

in the following exchanges allegedly from/in MINDANAW that I copied

from one blog or website in the past.

-------START OF COPIED MATERIAL-------
Barangay RP

« Adonis lawyers, NUJP, CMFR file petition for writ of habeas

corpus on behal of Adonis
US joins Zambo blast probe; MILF-Abu blamed »

“History must highlight Moro heroism”
By barangayrp

Quantcast

ALABEL, Sarangani (MindaNews/31 May) — A respected leader of the

Indigenous Peoples here said history must be rewritten for the

public to know the bravery and heroism of the Moro people who

fought in defending the country against foreign invaders.


Fredo Basino, one of the leaders of Blaans here and the provincial

administrator of Sarangani said, “If Mindanao is considered part of

the Philippines, then we must highlight the struggle of the Moro

people who defended this land.”

He said people fought for freedom. He noted that everyone must

still possess the will to fight for freedom. “And we need to attain

freedom, freedom from poverty,” Basino stressed.

He noted that an economic revolution is essential considering that

“we are not well developed and can be considered one of the weakest

links in the Asia-Pacific region.”

“Now the battle is against poverty,” he pointed out. “Let us tell

the people to fight poverty,” he said.

Oscar Solaiman, a Tausug leader in General Santos City, said

“Mindanao history has to be revised to be able to tell what

transpired before.”

“And we must not forget that there are Moro and the Indigenous

people who have been heroes in their own history, he added. “They

were defenders, thus they must be recognized,” he stressed.

Al Nezzar Ali, a Moro artist and local historian from General

Santos City said “there is no history written for the Moro people,

only opinions.”

He stressed that history must not be focused mainly on heroism and

idealism. “History must be rewritten to accommodate new findings

and propose new insights and thesis,” Ali said. (Gandhi C.

Kinjiyo/MindaNews)

This entry was posted on May 31, 2008 at 2:56 am and is filed under

indigenous pople, moro struggle. You can follow any responses to

this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or

trackback from your own site.
2 Responses to ““History must highlight Moro heroism””

1. Mahar Sumilang Says:
June 8, 2008 at 12:33 am | Reply

Tunay ngang napapanahon na. Mabuhay ang mga liping kayumanggi

sa kaMindanaoan!

barangayrp:

Tumpak! Per, matagal na rin namang recognized ang naging

papel ng mamamayang Moro sa kasaysayan ng ating bansa. Yun nga

lang, dahil sa umiiral na kolonyalisasyon ng US hanggang sa

kasalukuyan, talagang hindi na ito binibigyang halaga ng

pamahalaan.

They see Mindanao now as potential sources of money to fill

their pockets. Kaya nga kahit sa peace talks e di sila seryoso.

Pati nga US e nagkampo na sa Mindanaw para mabantayan ang mga

target nilang mineral doon.
2. TALIBA Says:
June 8, 2008 at 12:49 am | Reply

Ang mga kuwento at kadakilaan ng buhay at kabayanihan ng

ating mga ninuno at mga Bayani ng Lahi sa Mindanao ay itinago ng

mga mananakop at ng mga sumunod na pamahalaan/administrasyong

kanilang iniluklok, upang mailihim sa kamulatan ng buong bansa at

mga mamamayan sa Luzon at Bisayas, dahil sa takot na ito’y maaaring

magsilbing ningas ng panibagong alab ng kabayanihan mula sa Lahing

Kayumanggi, na magtatayo ng interes ng mga katutubo at bubuwag sa

kasalukuyan mapang-aping kalakaran.

barangayrp:

Isa itong taktika ng pagbura/pagbabago ng takbo ng

kasaysayan.. ang pagbabaon sa limot ng kawalan, sa pamamagitan ng

sinadyang kawalan ng mga literatura, pananaliksik at mga tala-

kasaysayan ng isang partikular na lugar. Kaya lang, nawa’y hindi

malaglag sa linya ng pyudalismo ang pakikibakang-Moro sa

kasalukuyan, tulad ng naging karanasan ng MNLF.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).
-------END OF COPIED MATERIAL-------

POST 0017

August 04, 2010
9:19 p.m. Manila Time

AS THE SUPREMO* OF THIS MY BLOG:) I have decided to insert these four (4) writings RE BANGSAMORO before continuing my usual antique antics. These are EXTREMELY IMPORTANT for the HISTORY OF THIS COUNTRY & should be read by everyone, FOREIGNERS, FILIPINOS, INDIOS, MOROS, etcetc. The ABBAS BROTHERS were a pair of VERY BRIGHT MORO LEADERS from a mixed M'RANAW-TAUSUG ancestry. In this first article, the author holds firmly to the conviction that his brother was MURDERED. ABBAS also relates important details RE NINOY AQUINO... This point-of-view from the MUSLIM MOROS is what I have termed the "BANGSAMORO PERSPECTIVE" on PHILIPPINE HISTORY.

-------START OF COPIED ABBAS ARTICLE-------
March 27, 2007
WAR IN MORO LAND (Last Phase) by Jun Abbas | History, Socio-

Political, Bangsa Moro, Moroland, Religious/Cultural
jamalashley @ 3:07 am

March 31 is the birth anniversary of Macapanton Rashid Yahya Abbas, Jr., my eldest brother. Among our siblings, I was probably the one closest to him during the years 1977-91. We were together in Saudi Arabia from 1977 to 1983 and again in 1985. We were also briefly together in Paris, France. I also helped him put up an office in Kuala Lumpur in 1985. When he came back to the Philippines, he set up the SSB Holdings, Inc. SSB was practically a 2-man job. In his unsuccessful bid for the Philippine Senate in1992, I was his Campaign Chief of Staff. After the elections, our paths drifted apart. He concentrated more in Mindanao. The last 10 years of his life centered on his wife and children in Lanao and Metro Manila.

On 17 September 2003, Jun Abbas was, as far as I am concerned, murdered at the Makati Medical Center.

Returning from Mindanao after speaking and other official engagements, Jun proceeded to Makati Medical Center for an executive check-up. He was administered a massive dose of dextrose “3 bottles within three hours“ supposedly to lower his sugar count
and to counter his alleged dehydration. While the third bottle was filling his body organs with liquid, he coughed; and, later, he was gasping for breath. His wife, daughters and sister desperately called for a doctor but nobody came. They implored the nurses to call any doctor. Incredibly, NOT A SINGLE DOCTOR WAS AVAILABLE at
the supposedly top-notch Makati Medical Center. Yet when it was all over for Jun, the doctors suddenly came rushing from nowhere.

When I later told my doctor-friends about it, they all said that Jun died of DROWNING. Nobody could survive such a massive dose of dextrose in so short a time.

A few weeks before this happened; Jun led a top-level Moro delegation to meet with President GMA. The Moros, which included almost all elected and appointed top government officials, demanded the ouster of a top Cabinet official, whom the Moros accused as responsible for escalating the war in Mindanao. GMA agreed and sacked the official.

After Jun's passing away, that top official was back at the Cabinet.

For years, I had been telling him to write his memoirs on the Bangsa Moro revolution if he wanted history to recognize his central role in it. There are already many versions floating around.

Amazingly, just before he died, he submitted to Ateneo a long and rambling essay where he mentioned his role in the revolutionary movement. The Ateneo Law Journal editors must have realized the importance of such a document. They had it published immediately, including all the grammatical errors.

Jun Abbas's last published article was

IS A BANGSA MORO STATE WITHIN A FEDERATION THE SOLUTION?

(Ateneo Law Journal Vol. 48 Sept 2003)
(Macapanton Rashid Yahya Abbas, Jr, was Full Professor at the King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in the mid to late 1970s)

Here is an excerpt from that article:

===========================

WAR IN MORO LAND (Last Phase)

The brief history of the present Bangsa Moro Struggle, which I will present in the first person because I was one of the original members of the movement from 1965 onward. This is perhaps the first time I will be writing on this matter because I want the Bangsa Moro Youth and the Filipino People to understand the Islamic Struggle of our people while there are still some of the originators of the struggle who are still alive and involved in different capacities in the society.

Even before the Jabidah Massacre in 1968, the Muslim students organized on the national level, the CNI Scholars Association and the Muslim Students Association of the Philippines which started as social organizations. In 1965, because of the Vietnam War and massive influx of settlers to Mindanao, the student leaders from UP
injected these issues and started the militancy of the Muslim students. The first issue to be questioned was the policy of "National Integration"" because the Muslims believe that they can not be integrated culturally and socially to the Philippine society that is based on Christian values and acceptance, of Spanish colonialism as a blessing and heritage that resulted to the Christianization of the Philippines. The scholars and the Commission on National Integration supported this position and what the country needed was "unity in diversity" and possibly a "federal system of government" since amendments to the constitution was on the national agenda for 1971.

The Muslim Youth organized that National Coordinating Council for Islamic Affairs (NACCIA) and issued a Manifesto entitled "Al Wahid" in 1967 calling on the Filipino leadership to pay greater attention to the miserable situation of the Muslims before
rebellion will break out. There was a massive influx of settlers to the Muslim areas and displacement of Muslims and Lumads was widespread. The government was encouraging the immigration of settlers from Visayas especially from Negros provinces, Leyte, Samar, and Iloilo, because of the problems of the sugar plantation
workers. There were also massive logging activities denuding the Mindanao forests by concessionaires from Luzon like the Antoninos, Sarmientos, Valencias, Floreindos, Alcantaras, etc.. These new economic elite who were the agents of Korean, Japanese, US and European companies destroyed the forests of Mindanao which were preserved because of the failure to colonize the Bangsa Moro.

These groups that destroyed the environment are now the industrial and financial controllers of the region including installing their proteges in the political positions and even dictate policies for the Bangsa Moro. The NACCIA warned that these economic aggressions against the Muslims in their homeland and political displacement will be met with armed struggle. The government did not listen as usual.

In 1968, trainees from Sulu (Sulu and Tawi-tawi was one province then) in the Army were massacred by their officers at Corregidor when they demanded their pay and to return to their homes because they refused to go Sabah to infiltrate and start the rebellion to reclaim Sabah for the Philippines. The Commanding Officer was Major
Eddie Martelino, an alleged convert to Islam (who was later executed by the MNLF-Malaysians in Sabah after his capture sometime in 1978-79). This incident led Congressmen Rashid Lucman, Salipada Pendatun and Salih Ututalum to demand congressional investigations backed by massive youth demonstrations which took over the Congress premises. Only Congressmen Indanan Ani and Ali Dimaporo sided with
President Marcos.

The Union of Islamic Forces and Organizations composed of all the National Muslim organizations under the leadership of Sultan Rashid Lucman was organized. I was elected Secretary General. My assignment was to organize the demonstrations. I organized and led the demonstrations in front of Congress while Nur Misuari and Abul
Alonto organized the sit-in at Freedom Park, Malacanang. I led the demonstration in Jolo the first and last anti-government demonstration of around 10,000 persons and in Cotabato City with the MIM and Marawi City with the BMLF leaders. I was then Private Secretary to Commissioner Tamano at CNI, so, I filed my resignation which was not accepted, but I was allowed to go on leave of absence by Executive Secretary Rafael Salas because I refused to desist from leading the demonstrations. I told him, "if Ilonggo soldiers were massacred, would you keep silent because you are in
government?" He smiled and told me that he will inform President Marcos, and they will not take any action against me. Despite my action, my brother-in-law was taken as the Muslim Senatorial candidate. Maybe Marcos would have dealt with the Muslims properly if only Martial Law was not declared. In that election, only Congressman Pendatun was returned to Congress because of massive fraud and vote buying which defeated the anti-Marcos Congressmen but a Muslim senator was elected in the person of Senator Mamintal Tamano.

The foreign trained Top 90 has returned home and were welcomed by Senator Ninoy Aquino at Malabang, Lanao Sur. The local training camps were established and the Top 90 became the trainors. At that time, the secret organization was the Bangsa Moro Liberation Front (BMLF) which was later named Bangsa Moro Liberation Organization
(BMLO) under Sultan Rashid Lucman and General Salipada Pendatun.

The Top 90 also secretly organized the Moro National Liberation Front headed by Nur Misuari and Abul Alonto. The young Ulama, professionals and youth leaders were with the BMLF. This was also the first time that Bangsa Moro was used to refer to the Muslims in the Philippines. The MNLF used Moro only. This came after the Muslim Youth National Assembly (MYNA) wherein, over 200 youth leaders met in Zamboanga City at the same time with the Muslim Association of the Philippines Congress in 1969. Almost all the future leaders of the MNLF, MILF, BMLO and political leaders of the
Muslims were present.

The MYNA debated independence or federation as the exercise of the right of self-determination of the Bangsa Moro people. After two days, the vote that won was to participate in the Constitutional Convention election of 1971 and proposed a Federal system to get a Bangsa Moro state. That is why, Nur Misuari, Mike Mastura, Musib Buat, Hussin Pangato of MIM, others and myself ran in the Concon elections and only Mike Mastura was able to make it due to massive cheating and vote buying to assure Marcos a majority. The Federal proposal never saw the light of day in the Concon and the Constitution of 1973 did not contain any provision to respect Bangsa Moro right of self-determination. Only Delegate Banjamin Abubakar of Sulu refused to vote for the approval of the Constitution and he truly represented the aspirations of the Bangsa Moro people and not the Muslim delegates who capitulated to Marcos.[1]

The 1970-72 period saw the escalation of violence between the Barracudas and Ilagas in Lanao Norte and Black shirts and Ilagas in the Cotabato massacres. The Ilagas “rats” were paramilitary forces of President Ferdinand E. Marcos and supported by the AFP directly or indirectly. The Mindanao Independence Movement was organized by Datu Udtog Matalam, patriarch of Cotabato, in 1969 which led to the violent clashes and became the stimulus for the government and Christian militias to launch massacres against unarmed Muslims as in the Manile, Cotabato massacre of Muslims in a Masjid (mosque); the Lutayan; the Tacub; the IPIL and the Pata, Sulu massacres etc. The people of Buldon fought a battle against the AFP wherein the air force, artillery and tanks were used against a Moro town. They fought until Mayor Tomatic Aratuc met with President Marcos and the government forces were withdrawn.

That time the President was the real Commander-in-Chief and was responsible for all the military assaults on the Moro Communities. This situation continued and the BMLF under Sultan Lucman and General Pendatun decided to file genocide charges against President Marcos at the UN and also at the OIC. A Petition was filed with UN Commission on Human Rights, through the UN Office in Manila in 1971. This was reported on the BBC world radio and was heard by Col. Ghadaffi of Libya who was then the new leader of his country and decided to respond. He sent his Foreign Minister Saleh Buoyaser to Manila as a Professor to attend the World Universities Conference. That was how the Bangsa Moro case was internationalized. This led to the organization of the Islamic Directorate of the Philippines (IDP) where all the Muslim political leaders joined as well the youth leaders including the writer,
Misuari and Salamat. Dean Ceasar Adib Majul was elected Chair as non-partisan leader and this author Secretary General.

OIC RECOGNITION

As mentioned earlier, this author was sent as a lawyer to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in February 1972 at the Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers of the OIC. He met with Secretary General Tengku Abdul Rahman and asked King Faisal Bin Abdul Aziz to mention the issue in his speech. King Faisal also called Tun Abdul Razak to support the case, which Malaysia did. Minister Buoyaser of Libya coordinated with the Moros and got the Bangsa Moro issue into the agenda for the next conference in Libya. That was how the Bangsa Moro issue became the concern of the OIC from 1972 to the present, 29 years and still not finally settled. When martial law was declared, the
author was arrested and detained at Fort Bonifacio. In 1976, he went into exile in Saudi Arabia until 1987, after EDSA I upon invitation of the government under President Corazon C. Aquino. In 1972, the Bangsa Moro clans led the fight against the military that were sent to the Moro areas to collect loose firearms which started with the October uprising in Marawi in 1972. Later in 1973, the MNLF gradually took over the leadership of the armed struggle because of the weapons they were able to bring into Mindanao and logistics donated by supporters of the Bangsa Moro JIHAD. The OIC and many Islamic organizations and governments gave political and material support to the Bangsa Moro. The OIC Foreign Ministers of Saudi Arabia, Libya, Somalia and Senegal came to the Philippines in 1973 and met with the President and agreed to work out a political solution. They went to the Muslim areas up to Sulu. In 1974, the burning of Jolo resulted when the MNLF fighters entered Jolo and a very big battle raged with naval bombardment ordered against Jolo in disregard for innocent civilian lives.

As a consequence, the 1974 Islamic Summit was held in Islamabad, Pakistan. The Summit declared that the situation of the Bangsa Moro Muslims was not an internal problem but a concern of the whole Muslim world. This was demanded by the Malaysian Prime Minister Tun Abdul Razak. The Bangsa Moro was allowed to convene in Marawi City by President Marcos. The Confederation of the Royal Houses of Mindanao, Sulu and Palawan led by its Chairman, Sultan Harun Al Rashid Lucman and this author as the Supervising Officer of the Presidential Task Force for the Reconstruction and Development of Mindanao, held the "Mindanao Policy Conference" and came out with a resolution demanding regional political autonomy. This was at the height of martial law and it became the political basis for the OIC to demand regional political autonomy and the demand for negotiations with the Bangsa Moro leaders and the MNLF at the 1974 Kuala Lumpur Conference of OIC-ICFM. At this time there was only one leadership and organization – the MNLF. The Bangsa Moro struggle got the support of the Muslim states and the first negotiation between MNLF and GRP was in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia hosted by the OIC in 1975. Executive Secretary Alejandro Melchor led the GRP delegation.

NEGOTIATIONS WITH BANGSA MORO

In 1976, the government created a negotiating panel headed by Carmelo Z. Barbero to talk peace again with the MNLF. The talks were held under the auspices of the OIC in Tripoli, Libya. The peace talks resulted in the forging of the now historic Tripoli
Agreement and recognized as the historic territories of the Bangsa Moro Darul Salam of the Sultanates of Sulu, Maguindanao, Pat-a Pagampong a Ranao, Rajah Buayan and Saragani or the areas almost corresponding to the Moro Province during the American occupation which is the whole of Mindanao, Sulu and Palawan except the Caraga Region. To end the war, the areas of autonomy consisting of 13 provinces and cities therein were recognized by the GRP as the Bangsa Moro Homeland. These are the areas which were later constituted as the SZOPAD - Special Zone of Peace and Development.

President Marcos held a referendum on the areas of autonomy and reduced the area to 10 provinces and cities and established the Regional Commissions for Regions 9 and 12. The violation of the Tripoli Agreement was from its inception and it was more honored in the breach rather in compliance. In 1977, Hashim Salamat, the MNLF Vice Chairman for Foreign Affairs left the organization and formed as separate faction of the MNLF. After a few years when OIC did not recognize him, Salamat organized the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), emphasizing Islam instead of only political and economic grievance of the Bangsa Moro.

This split was later followed in 1982 when the Moro Peoples National Congress of MNLF led by Atty. Abdul Basit Harrid (Jibril Riddah) and Haji Napis Bidin ousted Chairman Nur Misuari and installed Commander Dimas Pundato as Chairman, supported by many active commanders in the Homeland. Pundato was then Vice-Chairman of Misuari's MNLF. The BMLO and the Pundato faction later joined forces and established the MNLF-Reformist Group. The group disbanded when Pundato joined the government as OMA Chief under President Corazon Aquino. The reformist commanders who did not join the government like Cdr. Digo and Cdr. Iqra formed in 1999, the new MNLF-Islamic Command Council with Mujahab Hashim as Chairman and Cdr. Milham Alam as Chief of Staff. Eventually, the four MNLF factions reunited and approved a constitution in Tripoli, Libya, April 2003. They have not yet elected a Chairman and other officers.

TRIPOLI AGREEMENT 1976

The government implemented the Tripoli Agreement unilaterally in a manner that was in contravention with the letter and spirit of the said Agreement. In 1986, President Marcos was deposed through "People Power" and Corazon C. Aquino ascended to the Presidency. She did not honor fully the Tripoli Agreement according to MNLF,
the only pact, treaty or agreement signed during the Marcos regime that Aquino refused to recognize despite the commitment of Ninoy Aquino, to fully implement the Tripoli Agreement and if autonomy would not work after ten years, he will support the independence of Bangsa Moro. This author was present when this statement was made in 1982 because Sultan Rashid Lucman, General Salipada Pendatun and this author met with King Khalid Bin Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia with Ninoy Aquino at the King's Palace in Taif, Saudi Arabia. We also arranged and gave Ninoy his passport "Marcial Bonifacio" which he filled-up at Sheraton Hotel, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in this author's presence.

The author was able, with exiled Moro leaders in Saudi Arabia like the late Ambassador Mauyag Tamano, to convince the then OIC Secretary General Puzada to send a message to President Aquino recognizing her as the President of the Philippines in March 1, 1986. This was five days after EDSA I and the forty-nine (49) Muslim states were the first to recognize the legality of EDSA I. This fact has never been mentioned in the EDSA I history which is unfortunate because the Bangsa Moro conflict would have been settled much earlier.

President Aquino created a Constitutional Commission (ConCom) that drafted a new constitution for the country. The new constitution contained a provision for the creation of an Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao. The new constitution was ratified in 1987 and a new Congress was established in the same year. Art. X was the
reason why the MNLF broke-off negotiations with President Aquino and the MNLF did not recognize the Organic Act. The MILF adopted the same position and both boycotted the elections. Majority of the Muslims rejected or boycotted the said Act. It was for this reason that the Act was ratified by only four (4) provinces. The Christians and the Lumad's (culturally indigenous groups) did not reject per se the concept of regional autonomy.

Senator Aquilino Pimentel Jr. sponsored the bill in the Senate- the "Organic Act for Muslim Mindanao" which was signed into law as Republic Act (RA) No. 6734. The MNLF and MILF claimed that it was a betrayal of the Tripoli Agreement, a charge that Senator Pimentel refuted by claiming that the law implemented 99% of the Tripoli
Agreement. President Ramos in 1993 revived negotiations with Chairman Misuari to fully implement the Tripoli Agreement as a binding international obligation and commitment. This was an admission that RA 6734 did not implement fully the Tripoli
Agreement. The Final Peace Agreement (FPA) was signed on September, 1996 between the MNLF/OIC and GRP in Jakarta and finally in Manila.

FINAL PEACE AGREEMENT (FPA) 1996

The FPA provided for the reorganization of the ARMM and the establishment of the Southern Philippines Council for Peace and Development (SPCPD) and its Consultative Assembly (CA). The SPCPD was tasked with coordinating development programs and projects for Mindanao but the government failed to provide the necessary funds and support facilities to the SPCPD, the government had allegedly allocated FORTY ONE BILLION PESOS (P41B) but only Eighteen (18B) Billion Pesos had been disbursed according to SPCPD/ARMM officials form 1996-2000. It also did not cooperate with the SPCPD in implementing the development programs and projects for Mindanao.

There was inadequate funding and later in the Senate Hearings the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) admitted that the total releases for ARMM were below P18 Billion under the term of Regional Governor Misuari and most of the funds were for personnel services for the devolved agencies. There was nothing "Final" in the
Agreement because it was subject to the "Will of Congress" and the "Dictates of the Executive."

The creation of the Mindanao Coordinating Council had sidelined the SPCPD (established by E.O. 371), which was created by President Estrada to be the arm of the Office of the President in the planning, recommendation, coordination and monitoring/validating nationally and internationally funded socio-economic projects in the SZOPAD areas. The Chairman of the Consultative Assembly of SPCPD announced that there would be en masse resignations by the ASSEMBLYMEN because the MCC under EO 261, S.2000, and the SPCPD/ARMM were monitoring and validating agencies but were not represented in the council and no Muslim was appointed to the council. This author was invited to address the First Joint Sessions of the ARMM-RLA and the SPCPD-Consultative Assembly on September, 2001 upon the invitation of Chairman Misuari at General Santos City. The creation of the MCC and non-implementation of the FPA and the failure to enact the Organic Act agreed to in the FPA was denounced and the resolution was forwarded to GRP and the OIC Fact Finding Mission of the OIC. Fr. Eliseo Mercado claims that the SPCPD has been rendered virtually inutile as Chairman Nur Misuari has earlier declared. Without the SPCPD then, the FPA should be considered revoked at least by implication because there is no more implementing agency. After the ratification last August 14, 2001 of the Organic Law, then the SPCPD was ipso facto abolished and the SPDA was abolished in 2002.

From 1999 to 2002 the government failed to fully implement the FPA in its substantive provisions as far as MNLF/OIC is concerned (later as evidenced by Resolution No. 02-30, May 30, 2003, 30th ICFM at Tehran, Iran). At the same time the negotiations with the MILF broke down and led to renewed fighting between government
troops and this time, the MILF carried on the Moro armed struggle when the MNLF decided to stop fighting after they signed the FPA and its chairman became then ARMM regional governor and concurrent SPCPD chairman. On the other hand, Joseph Ejercito Estrada was elected President in 1998 with the support of the MILF and many Islamic organizations because he signed an agreement with Ummah Party of Lanao del Sur to pursue peace and development and appoint a Muslim to the cabinet and other high positions. He also announced that he would establish a Malacanang in the south as well as implement the peace process and the FPA.

AGREEMENT WITH MILF

In August of 1998, the GRP and MILF signed an Interim Agreement to

continue the negotiations started with the GRP under President

Ramos. There was a lot of goodwill because the new AFP chief of

Staff, General Nazareno was even endorsed by MILF and the MILF

supported President Estrada on the week of the elections. The

President knew this, Presidential Adviser for Flagship Projects;

Robert Aventajado even brought the reply of the President to Camp

Abubakar and met with Chairman Hashim Salamat. He later became a

frequent visitor and gave socio-economic projects andinfrastructure

projects to MILF as confidence building measures and entered into

an agreement making the area a zone for peace. The GRP also

entered into agreements with MILF acknowledging the major camps of

the MILF and this was under President Estrada and not under

President Ramos. Everyone was euphoric that peace was at hand and

development and progress will follow as the peace dividends.

Later, the "all-out war" of President Estrada was launched against

the MILF despite the signing of the Aide Memoire between the GRP

and MILF. The rest is history chronicled in blood in Mindanao and

street protests all over the country. It culminated with EDSA II

and the ouster of Estrada.

The new President, Gloria Macapagal Arroyo declared an “all-out

peace” policy and dropped all the charges against Chairman Salamat

and other MILF leaders and started new negotiations. The new all

out war against MILF was again launched by Secretary Angelo Reyes

in February 2002 during the Eidul Adha prayers in the early morning

of February 10, 2003 at the Islamic Center of the Buliok complex at

Pikit, Cotabato after there was already a decision by both the GRP

and MILF to meet at Kuala Lumpur to discuss the peace agreement.

Secretary Eduardo Ermita even said on TV that day that it was â

€œtragic” because of the peace process was going smoothly. The

panels met at Kuala Lumpur for exploratory talks and came up with a

Joint Statement on March 28, 2003. This was after the Davao

International Airport bombing on March 4, 2003. The March 28, 2003

agreement was not implemented because of another bombing on April

4, 2003 at Sasa Port, Davao City. Again Exploratory Talks were held

at Kuala Lumpur and another agreement was made in June 21, 2003.

This was again not implemented because despite the two unilateral

declarations of MILF to stop all offensive military actions on May

28 and June 12, 2003, respectively, the AFP did respond and

military operations against the MILF forces continued.

However, on July 18, 2003, President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo

announced the signing of the Ceasefire Agreement between MILF and

GRP which was finally signed by MILF on July 20, 2003 because

Chairman Al Haj Murad was in the mountain areas at that time,

Chairman Hashim Salamat already died on July 13, 2003 and since

Murad signed the Ceasefire Agreement, it is significant because he

was already the Chairman of the MILF and the GRP signed through

Secretary Eduardo Ermita, Chairman of the GRP panel. The

Coordinating Committee for the Cessation of Hostilities (CCCH) of

GRP-MILF met for the IOTH- CCCH meeting at Cotabato City on August

4, 2003. I was present as a guest being the Secretary General of

the Philippine Muslim Leaders Forum. The CCCH is now operational

and they are working to organize the Local Monitoring Team (LMT's)

to enforce the ceasefire. Malaysia is expected to send observers.

The ceasefire agreement between the GRP and MILF was signed

principally because of the insistence of the Philippine Muslim

Leaders Forum (PMLF) which is the broadest loose associations of

Muslim elected and appointing Muslim officials with the government

to stop military operations and enforce the ceasefire.

In a letter sent to President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo on July 16,

2003 by PMLF Chairman Deputy Speaker Gerry Salapuddin[2] presented

the situation and urgent need for a ceasefire to restart the peace

talks:

"The MILF officials met with U.S. officials for two hours yesterday

and have discussed the relationship and time-line with the U.S. in

the peace process. They are also coordinating with Malaysia.

After our lengthy discussions, we have agreed that the PMLF will

present to Your Excellency the herein suggestions to break the

impasse. I called Secretary Eduardo Ermita in the presence of the

MILF officials and told him about these suggestions, and he agreed

that this Memorandum be submitted today.

As agreed last June 21, 2003, once the GRP drops the charges and

cancels the warrants and begins the phased redeployment of military

forces in Buliok, which it has started with the return of the

Islamic Center, and the MILF has internally ordered their men at

arms to desist as they have desisted from offensive military

actions, the GRP will Issue a SOMO soonest after June 23, 2003.

Immediately, by June 28, 2003 the Coordinating Committee on the

Cessation of Hostilities (CCCH) will be reconvened for the

permanent ceasefire and reactivate the Local Monitoring Teams

(LMTs). The GRP CCCH Chairman shall be headed by a General from the

AFP. The meeting was supposed to be held on June 28, 2003 in

Estosan Hotel, Cotabato. Arrangements were to be made by Secretary

Norberto Gonzales but the meeting did not push through because Sec.

Gonzales left for Europe. He rescheduled it for July 12, 2003 but

he GRP panel was informed late and therefore asked for

postponement. It was rescheduled to July 18, 2003 but Malaysia is

still waiting for the settlement of the Issue on the warrants of

arrest and the MILF is also waiting for the SOMO of the GRP.

In view of these developments, we agreed to propose that the

meeting be held immediately between the GRP and the MILF wherein

both parties will simultaneously declare the effectivity of the

ceasefire agreement of June 21, 2003, convene the CCCH, and

reactivate the LMTs.

The Malaysians will now be requested to send the international

monitoring teams to monitor the ceasefire in coordination with the

CCCH and the LMTs.

As provided in the GRP-MILF joint communique of May 6, 2003 signed

in Malaysia, "the MILF and GRP shall from an Ad-Hoc Joint Action

Group against criminal elements in order to pursue and apprehend

such criminal elements." Furthermore, the Ad-Hoc Joint Action Group

"will operate in tandem with their respective Coordinating

Committees on the Cessation of Hostilities."

The U.S. can now be requested to contribute funds for the

operation of the CCCH and the LMTs as well as discuss with the

GRP-MILF the areas or projects where the U.S. can contribute the

funds as offered."[3]

Again, in the Memorandum sent by the author to Secretary Eduardo

Ermita on GRP and MILF Negotiations dated July 17, 2003, where he

amplified in the Memorandum of Deputy Speaker for Mindanao Gerry

Salapudin and discussed the Minutes of the March 28, 2003 Joint

Statement and the June 21, 2003 GRP-MILF understanding and the

letter of US President Bush to Chairman Salamat, he stated that:

"The Joint Statement of March 28, 2003 between the GRP and the MILF

agreed on the following points:

1. Both parties reiterate their commitment to achieve a

comprehensive, just and lasting political settlement of the

conflict in Mindanao and resolve to undertake appropriate steps to

pave the way for the resumption of the formal GRP-MILF peace

negotiations;

2. Both parties reaffirm to implement effectively on the ground

all past and existing GRP-MILF agreements. Details of

implementation shall be discussed by the Panels;

Both parties agree to exercise mutual restraint to minimize, if

not put an end to, violence in Mindanao;

To normalize the situation and facilitate the early return of

evacuees to their places of origin and allow rehabilitation to

proceed, a new arrangement on the ground will be forged by both

parties;

The Philippine government takes note of the activation of the

Bangsamoro Development Agency;

Both parties agree to direct their respective Technical Committees

to work on the Implementing Guidelines of the Joint Communiqué

signed on May 6, 2002 to ensure that the peace process is not

adversely affected by the presence of criminal groups in Mindanao.

The Technical Committees will meet within two (2) weeks from today;

The parties agree to improve the existing mechanism for monitoring

of the cessation of hostilities including the composition of an

observer/monitoring groups as provided for in the Implementing

Guidelines on the Security Aspect of the Tripoli Agreement on Peace

of 2001;

The parties reaffirm the provision on the grant of Safety and

Security Guarantees to MILF leaders and members who are directly

and principally involved in the GRP-MILF peace talks; and

Both parties express their gratitude for the gracious hospitality

of the Government of Malaysia in hosting and facilitating the

exploratory talks and for continuing its support to the peace

process."[4]

Under item no. 1, the phrase "resolved to undertake steps" means

the GRP agreed to undertake appropriate steps to cover the

withdrawal of AFP troops from Buliok Complex and recalls of

warrants of arrest issued against all MILF leaders and members.

The pull out and recalls will be conducted within 4 weeks from

today. While the term "resumption" means formal negotiation will

be back on track but Malaysia has to be consulted as agreed by both

parties. This item was again reiterated on June 21, 2003 between

the GRP and the MILF under item no. 3(b), "In response to this

positive development, the GRP has agreed to undertake the

following:

Facilitate the judicial process, in coordination with the

Department of Justice, leading to the lifting of the Warrants of

Arrests filed against MILF leaders and the Reward bounties for the

apprehension of certain MILF leaders;

Begin the process leading to the phased redeployment of military

forces from the Buliok Complex"[5]

It is very clear that the commitment to recall the Warrant of

Arrests against all MILF leaders should have been done within four

weeks from March 28, 2003 which was April 28, 2003 by the GRP. In

the June 21, 2003 Understanding mention again was made to

facilitate the judicial process with the DOJ to lift such warrants

and cancel the bounties. In the understanding of June 16, 2003

between the GRP and the MILF, the lifting of warrants and bounties

was an obligation of the GRP which they will consult with the

principal and the GRP agreed to these points. GRP has partially

withdrawn from Buliok Complex and returned the Islamic Center to

Datu Abbas Pendatun, Sanggunian Member of North Cotabato.

4. In the June 21, 2003 understanding, the GRP stated that "The

June 20, 2003 MILF Statement entitled "Policy Statement of MILF

Chair Salamat Hashim Rejecting Terror as a Means to Resolve

Differences" substantially responds to the need for the MILF to

publicly condemn terrorism and terrorist organizations."[6] The

GRP acceptance should have led to the GRP issuances of SOMO at the

soonest possible time immediately after June 23, 2003. A meeting of

the CCCH was scheduled on June 28, 2003 at Estosan, Cotabato City

to be coordinated by Sec. Gonzales and Atty. Ali. The purpose was

to re-establish the ceasefire under the agreement of June 2001 and

reactivated the LMT's. The Malaysian Monitoring Team will be

fielded to monitor the ceasefire all over the areas of conflict.

The GRP has already requested Malaysia.

6. In the understanding of June 21, 2003, On the issue of Chairman

Salamat's presence during the peace negotiations, the MILF noted

that Chairman Salamat has made known his intention to be present

during the finalization of the GRP-MILF Peace Agreement and on the

actual signing of the said Agreement.

The GRP, noting that Chairman Salamat's presence would be much

preferred during the talks, will request for Chairman Salamat's

presence during the Opening Ceremony for the resumption of formal

talks.[7] The MILF Panel informed the PMLF in our talks last June

15, 2003 that Chairman Salamat has agreed to be present in the

Opening Ceremony as confirmed to you in the memo of the PMLF.

7. Going back to the May 20, 2003 letter of Chairman Salamat to

President Bush, this was actually the 2nd letter. The 1st letter

(January 20, 2003) was a reply to US Ambassador Riciardone when he

spoke before the FCAP when he raised the questions: "The US

Government's desire to know What the MILF want or how its (the

problem) going to be resolved". The MILF said "We take this

opportunity to inform Your Excellency that the MILF is a national

liberation organization, with leadership supported by the Bangsa

Moro People, and with legitimate political goal to pursue the right

of the Moro nation to determine their future and political status.

As part of this process, we have an on-going negotiation with the

Government of the Republic of the Philippines to arrive at a

negotiated political settlement of the Mindanao conflict and the

Bangsa Moro problem, through the mediation and tender of good

offices of the Government of Malaysia."[8]

8. It is this letter that was answered by the Joint Statement of US

President and Arroyo on May 19, 2003 and the speech of Deputy

Secretary of State Richard Armitage explaining the new US Policy

which was accepted by MILF of their May 20, 2003 letter. The US

President instructed Assistant Secretary of State James A. Kelly to

reply on June 18, 2003 to the letter of Chairman Salamat dated May

20, 2003. This letter was hand carried by Deputy Assistant

Secretary of State Mathew Dailey and met with the MILF officials.

The basic points of the letter are:

-The United States Government is committed to the territorial

integrity of the Philippines.

-The United States recognizes that the Muslims of the southern

Philippines have serious, legitimate grievances that must be

addressed.

-The United States wishes to see an end to the violence in the

southern Philippines and is working to assist the Republic of the

Philippines in addressing the root causes of that violence.

-The United States is concerned about the links between the MILF

and international terrorist organizations and asks that those links

be severed immediately.

-The United States stands ready to support, both politically and

financially, a bon fide peace process between the Republic of the

Philippines and the MILF.

-The United States appreciates the notable work that the Government

of Malaysia has performed in this connection over the last two

years, and will not seek to supplant Kuala Lumpur; indeed, we week

to work with the Malaysians for a successful peace settlement.

-The United States Government will not mediate between the

Government of the Philippines, nor will it participate in the

negotiations directly. We have asked the United States Institute

of Peace, a respected conflict-resolution organization, to

encourage the negotiation process in coordination with the

Government of Malaysia. The USIP is ready to begin this task as

soon as we have a clear signal from you as to your readiness to

follow through."[9]

This declaration of the US government addressed to the leader of a

revolutionary organizations is a "First" for the US and World

Affairs and also a "First" for the Bangsamoro Movement because MNLF

Chairman Nur Misuari never received such a communication from the

US President, particularly at this time when the United States has

emerged as the only super power in the world. This policy

statement of the US President must be seriously considered by the

GRP because of the proposed implications not only in the

Philippines or Mindanao or the Asian but in the whole Muslim world.

The US offer of political and financial assistance to a bona fide

peace process be properly accepted and understood.[10]

It is a rebuff to the peace process because it is considered by the

United States as not bona fide or in bad faith. Both parties must

seriously evaluate their actions to restore confidence to the peace

process.

9. The assignment of the US government of the US Institute of Peace

(USIP) is a direct involvement of the US government because the

USIP is a Federal Institution funded by the US government since

1984 with the Congressional mandate and the Board of Directors are

all appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate just

like the members of the US Supreme Court. They have already

scheduled meeting with MILF and plan exchange of missions.

10. It is imperative that the GRP and MILF must implement their

agreements which are binding international obligations of both

parties mediated by Malaysia in March 28, 2003 and June 21, 2003

particularly convening the meeting of the CCCH and simultaneously

declare the resumption of the ceasefire under the agreement of 2001

and cancel all the warrants of arrests and bounties against all the

accused MILF. This is also the suggestion of the US as well as

Malaysia and other OIC countries in support of the appeal of

churches and other religious groups and civil society. The

conclusion of the US letter to Chairman Salamat clearly manifests

the US concern for a peaceful political settlement:

"I note with satisfaction that the MILF has declared a temporary

ceasefire, which I urge you to extend until a settlement is

concluded. Both sides need to refrain from actions that merely

perpetuate the cycle of violence. Neither side can win this

conflict on the battlefield; however, both the MILF and the

Republic of the Philippines can achieve a lasting victory for the

people of Mindanao by coming to a settlement."[11]

The two Memoranda played a vital role in convincing President

Gloria Macapagal Arroyo to declare the ceasefire on July 18, 2003,

five (5) days after the death of Chairman Hashim Salamat which was

only confirmed on August 4, 2003 during the resumption of the

meetings of the CCCH to re-establish the ceasefire.
-------END OF COPIED ARTICLE-------
-------
SUPladong REMOntado? SUPer REvolutionary MOro? Ano kaya ang tunay

na kahulugan nito? E-2-2-LOY

ALSO:
-------START OF COPIED ARTICLE-------
Bangsa Moro Conflict: Historical Antecedents and Present Impact

Posted on April 17, 2007.
Filed under: Bangsa Moro, History, Mindanao, Moroland, Socio-

Political | Tags: Abu Sayyaf, Bangsa Moro, historical roots, Islam,

MILF, Mindanao, Philippines |

In September 2000, I was invited to deliver a speech/lecture on the

Social Impact of the Moro Conflict at the University of the

Philippines in Los Banos. Later, I uploaded the speech in my

website and in one web forum I joined. Later, I found out that this

speech has been linked and/or re-published in various websites and

web fora. Some of the cited links do not exist anymore. At any

rate, here it is:
**********************************

A few years ago, I visited my girl friend's house. Her

septuagenarian Visayan grandmother was visiting them at the time.

Upon seeing me, the grandmother fled the room. She knew that her

granddaughter was going out with a Moro. But meeting a Moro in

person seemed to be too unnerving for the old lady. She is not an

illiterate barrio folk. She is a retired schoolteacher, her nephew

(i.e., her brother's son) is a governor and all her children are

degree-holders, two of them are lawyers.

I had a sexagenarian office mate who told me that when he was

growing up in Bicol, the kids' parents usually scare the children

off by shouting "the Moros are coming!" That announcement usually

made the kids run immediately to their houses for safety.

These two anecdotal samples illustrate the social impact of the

Mindanao conflict “ not of the present MILF/Abu Sayyaf crisis nor

of the MNLF wars in the 1970s. These were the effects on the

intermittent warfare between the Moros and the Spanish from the

16th to the 19th century. Although the Spanish have gone for more

than a hundred years now, the effects on the collective psyche of

the Filipinos remain.

The social impact of the present Mindanao conflict will simply be a

reiteration or reinforcement of the impact of the Moro conflict

since the arrival of the Spanish to these Islands. The social

impact of the Mindanao Conflict today is more or less the same as

the social impact of the late 60s to early 70s conflict between the

AFP-supported Christian vigilante groups led by the notorious

Ilagas and the various Moro private armies like the Baracudas,

Blackshirts, PUSA, etc. The social impact of today's Mindanao

conflict is more or less the same as that of the MNLF wars in the

˜70s. And for some of the parties concerned, the social impact of

the present Mindanao conflict is the same as that of the Moro Wars

during the American and Spanish eras. When it comes to Mindanao,

some things never change. There are of course variations, relating

to present conditions.

Perhaps what is needed now is to truly understand the Moro Problem,

from the viewpoint of the Moros. And only a thorough understanding

of history can give light to this issue. However, the Filipino

majority is reluctant to talk about history. They always claim that

the past should be buried and that everyone should be forward-

looking. During every crisis in Mindanao, the Christian Filipino

talk, write and generally disseminate their ideas on supposed

causes of the conflict and give various solutions to the conflict

greater access to education, more infrastructures, coddling Moro

leaders, peace negotiations, etc.

The Moros who call everyone's attention to historical past are

called obscurantists, obstructionists or simply rabble-rousers. But

the adage "he who forgets his past is sure to repeat it" cannot be

truer when applied to the so-called Moro Problem. No solution can

be found if the underlying causes are not considered. The Moros,

unlike the Christianized Filipinos, have a living culture, or as

the French say, culture vivant. This culture is steeped in history.

For example, the greatness of a man is not measured by how much

money he has in the bank, but for the most part, his bloodline

i.e., who his father, mother, grandparents and ancestors were.

Former US President John Quincy Adams in his defense of the Amistad

African prisoners declared that "Who we are is who we were." For

the Moros, that statement is almost sacrosanct.

THE MYTHS ABOUT MORO-PHILIPPINE HISTORY

The Filipinos as ONE nation since time immemorial

It must be emphasized and acknowledged that the Moros and the

Indios (the Christianized Filipinos) never constituted a nation and

that it was only in 1946, upon the proclamation of the Philippine

Republic that the Moros and the Indios became part of one nation-

state.

The World Maps

The earliest world map that included “the Philippines” is on

display at the Malacanang Museum. But lo and behold, the

Philippines was not on the map, only Mindanao and Palawan were

there. It is proof positive that before the Western world ever

heard of the Philippines, they already knew Mindanao and Palawan.

In a 1716 map, a group of Islands was labeled I. Philippinae

(Philippine Islands, plural) But Mindanao Island was also labeled.

This could be construed as indicating that Mindanao Island was not

part of the Philippine Islands. In an 18th European century map,

North Borneo was labeled as "Territories belonging to the Sultan of

Sulu."

The Myth of the Spanish Conquest of Moroland

The Christian majority in the country propagates the myth that

although the Moros fought, they were nevertheless conquered by the

Spaniards. History books call the Moro wars as rebellions that were

answered by Spanish punitive expeditions.

Going back to history, a look at the views of the other Europeans

would give a more objective conclusion. Let us see what the

Europeans themselves thought. The 14th Dutch governor of Moluccas,

Simon Cos, brushed away Spanish claims on Mindanao arguing that if

such claims were based on raiding villages, then the Maguindanaons

had much more territory to claim than the Spaniards. On May 16,

1658, Gov. Cos wrote to his superiors:

"The Muslims have the Spanish settlements burning and

blazing every year and take some 500 captives per raid, while the

Spaniards got only one Maguindanao last year."

When the French led by Admiral Cecille blockaded Basilan in 1845,

the Spanish governor protested alleging that Basilan had recognized

Spain's sovereignty just the year before, in February 1844. (This

alone is telling. This means that after almost 200 years in the

Philippines, the Spanish admitted that Basilan was still not under

their control.) The French answer was to force the Basilan datus to

sign a document affirming the "absolute independence of Basilan

vis-a-vis Spain" on January 13, 1845 aboard the steamer Archimede.

And on February 20, 1845, France forced the Sulu Sultan to formally

cede Basilan Island to France in exchange for 100,000 piastres or

500,000 French francs. The French Admiral totally ignored Spanish

protests. However, the French King, Louis Philippe decided against

taking Basilan although the French Cabinet already approved the

annexation, even allocating the budget for Basilan for that year.

In fact, France has more right than Spain to claim Basilan since

they got a formal cession from the Sultan of Sulu as well as formal

written agreement from the Basilan datus.

In answer to Spanish claims that the Moros were mere pirates, the

British Earl of Denby's instruction to Consul Palgrave on Aug. 25,

1877 stated:

"Her Majesty's government has never regarded the Sultan of

Sulu as a pirate; they never admitted the claim of Spain to

sovereignty over the archipelago;and in the interests of British

trade, they never have been disposed to regard with favor any

extension of Spanish authority or influence in the Sulu waters".

And what did the Spanish themselves think? In a letter by Spanish

Captain-General Marquma to the King of Spain in the late 18th

century, he wrote:

"From this time…these Moros have not ceased to infest our

colonies. Innumerable are the Indios they have captured, the

ranches they have destroyed and the vessels they have taken. It

seems as if God has preserved them for vengeance on the Spanish

that they have not been able to subject them in in 200years in

spite of the expeditions sent against them, the armaments spent

every year to pursue them. In a very little while, we conquered the

islands of the Philippines, but the little islands of Sulu, parts

of Mindanao and other islands nearby, we have not been able to

subjugate to this very day."

Scanning through the various Spanish reports and other official

documents ”bandos y circulares, cartas, cedularios, memorias, etc.“

one could see the pain and destruction suffered by the Spanish

masters and their Indio subjects at the hands of the Moros. The

Moros regularly raided Spanish settlements in Luzon, Visayas and

Mindanao. The report of Spanish Governor-General Manuel de Arandia

to the King of Spain dated May 24, 1755 enumerated the losses

suffered by the Spanish from the Moros, who attacked with impunity

most of the Spanish settlements in Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao

which brought the Islands practically to its knees ("en el

deplorable estado y fatal sistema").

Even the Americans belittled Spanish claims in Mindanao. In his

Foreword to his book, Swish of the Kris: The Story of the Moros,

Vic Hurley wrote:

"The close of the unsuccessful Spanish conquest of Moroland

marked the beginning of the end of one of the most remarkable

resistance in the annals of military history. The Moslems has

staged a bitter and uninterrupted warfare against the might of

Spain for a period of 377 years. It is doubtful if this record has

been equaled in the whole bloody history of military aggression.

The Dons, accustomed to the easy conquests of Peru and Mexico, met

their match and more in the jungles of Mindanao."

Historical records show that the Mindanao, Sulu and Palawan were

never conquered by Spain and therefore the Treaty of Paris in 1898

was void ab initio with regards to Mindanao. The US had no right to

take over Moroland, except through the law of Conquest.

The Myth of Socio-Economic-Political Backwardness

The Filipino also insist that it was Spain that brought

civilization to the Philippines. The former President Fidel Ramos

once declared that before the coming of Spain, the natives of the

country had nothing but a crude political system known as

barangays. The political and economic systems of the sultanates

were certainly more complex than the Indios' barangay systems. The

Dutch anthropologist Ruurdje Laarhoven has this to say about the

Maguindanao sultanate in the 17th century:

"The Maguindanao rulers must be credited for their astuteness

in utilizing their strategic position between the Spanish-

controlled Philippines and the Dutch-controlled Moluccas. They were

able to mobilize the rivalry of these European powers to neutralize

each other while successfully maintaining its independence and

advancing its own political development. Even factional struggles

within the Mindanao confederacy can be seen positively as

indicators of political evolution towards a supra-tribal state able

to harness all human and ecological resources within its territory

for higher political goals, able to operate as a state in a larger

political arena defined by the presence of other state-organized

powers such as the Dutch, English and Spanish operating in

Southeast Asia." (Laarhoven : 1989, p. 181)

James F. Warren, in his book, The Sulu Zone, wrote:

"The source of Sulu's hegemony after 1768 was its role as a

regional emporium in the commerce between European traders,

southeast Asian realms and China. The increasing magnitude of this

external trade made regional distribution the dominant pattern of

the economy of the Tausug state and established itsascendancy in

the region."

The Sultanates of Maguindanao, Sulu and Buayan entered into several

treaties with European powers like Netherlands, England and even

Spain. European powers never entered into treaties with barangay

datus. Blood compact was the preferred mode of the Europeans when

negotiating with barangay chieftains.

The Filipino people were united in their desire for Independence

from the US.

During the American Occupation, the great majority of the Moros

fought for independence through peaceful and even violent means.

And they repeatedly communicated their desire for Independence. And

if they could not have Independence, they would rather be with the

Americans than with the Filipinos. The Wood-Forbes Commission

Report of 1922 stated:

"The Moros are a unit against independence and are united

for continuance of American control and, in case of separation of

the Philippines from the US, desire their portion of the Islands to

be retained as American territory under American control. The

pagans and non-Christians, constituting 10% of the population, are

for continued American control. They want peace and security, These

the Americans have given them."

Countering Filipino propaganda that the Americans simply wanted to

grab the lands of the Moros, Datu Gumbay Piang of Buayan declared

in a speech in 1926 that the Moros "would be between two fearful

and objectionable daggers: American at the one side and Filipino at

the other. As a defenseless people they would have no alternative

but choose which dagger would be less injurious. And, funny to say,

they have already, since long ago, chosen the American dagger."

With the intensified fight for Philippine Independence led by

Manuel L. Quezon, the Moros sent various petitions to the US

President and the US Congress. On June 9, 1921, the Moros of Sulu

sent a petition to the US government which stated:

"We are independent for 500 years. Even Spain failed to

conquer us. If the U.S. quits the Philippines, and the Filipinos

attempt to govern us, we will fight."

On February 4, 1924, another petition to the US Congress was signed

by more than 100 datus led the Maguindanao Sultan Mangigin. The

petition in part reads:

"In the event that the United States grant independence to

the Philippine Islands without provision for our retention under

the American flag, it is our firm intention and resolve to declare

ourselves an independent Constitutional sultanate to be known to

the world as Moro Nation."

The Moros found sympathetic ears in the US Congress. On May 6,

1926, Congressman Robert L. Bacon of New York gave a stirring

speech in support of the Moros. He said:

"Their (the Moros') so-called representation in the

Philippine Legislature is a farce and a mockery. They are

deliberately denied any share or participation in the government.

They have no elective representatives…They have no magistrates,

no judges, no public prosecutor drawn from their own people. And

the guardians of law and order in their region “constabulary“ are

practically drawn from the ranks of their hereditary enemies “the

Filipinos." The Filipinos are their lawmakers, their governors,

their judges, their persecutors and their policemen. To these

conditions the Moros respond by giving nothing but hate and

unwilling submission."

Some 75 years later, and the Moros find themselves still with no

representation in the Senate, very few judges, and the guardians of

law and public order “the military and police“ are still

practically drawn from the ranks of the Filipinos. Congressman

Bacon added:

"The Philippine Islands are divided into two very distinct

areas “the Christian provinces and the Mohammedan territory".These

two regions belong to different and opposed civilizations “the

Christian world and Islam."

Congressman Bacon sponsored a bill that would retain Mindanao and

Sulu in the event of Philippine independence. Other similar bills,

the Roger, Cooper and Kies bills, were also deliberated in the US

Congress.

During the deliberations of the 1935 Constitutional Convention, 189

ranking Maranao datus sent an appeal to the US Government through

the Governor-General that stated:

"With regard to the forthcoming Philippine independence, we

foresee that the condition will be characterized by unrest,

suffering and misery"

One more discriminatory act of our Christian Filipino

Associates is shown in the recent constitution of the Philippine

Commonwealth. In that constitution, no provision whatsoever is made

that would operate for the welfare of the Moros, the (provision of

the) constitution are all for the welfare of the Christian

Filipinos and nothing for the Moros. As proof of this, our delegate

did not sign the constitution.

We do not want to be included in the Philippine

Independence (for) once an independent Philippines is launched

there will be trouble between us and the Christian Filipinos

because from time immemorial these two peoples have not lived

harmoniously. It is not proper for two antagonizing peoples live

together under Philippine Independence.

The Dansalan Declaration, as it came to be known went on to say

that the Maranaos would rather "drown in the lake" than be included

in the Philippine Independence.

The Honeymoon Years

Unfortunately for the Moros, World War II came about. When the US

granted Philippine independence after the war, the Moros neither

had the resources nor inclination to fight another war. Thus the

"honeymoon" with the Philippine Republic began, with very few

troubles like the Kamlon rebellion.

But in 1969, with the discovery of the Jabidah massacre, the Moros

realized that the honeymoon was over. From then on, up to the

present, the Moro fight continues.

The Present Conflict

It must be very clear to everyone that the Moro conflict today did

not begin in 1969. It did not begin with Misuari, Salamat or Abbas,

Jr. In 1969, they were the Young Turks but the independence

movement was led by the elders Congressman Lucman, Senator Pendatun

and other Moro leaders.

In 1972, President. Marcos told OIC officials that the Moros were

not united and could never unite, that Maranaos hate Maguindanaos

and both hate the Tausugs, etc., and that the Nationalistas would

not sit with a Liberal, etc.

The OIC then challenged the Moro community to refute Mr. Marcos’s

allegation. Thus was born the Islamic Directorate of the

Philippines (IDP). The founding directors included Maranao, Tausug,

Maguindanao, Nationalista and Liberal Party leaders. For the first

time political rivals Lucman and Dimaporo, Sinsuat and Pendatun,

and other Moro leaders like Anni, Abubakar, Sen, Tamano, Sen.

Alonto and a host of others including the Young Turks Abbas, Jr.,

Misuari and Salamat joined together in one organization to prove to

the Islamic countries that the Moros were united. The founding

chair of IDP was Dr. C. Adib Majul, then the Dean of the UP College

of Arts and Sciences. Abbas, Jr. was the Secretary-General.

The present conflict in Mindanao does not pertain to only the MILF

and the Abu Sayyaf, although they are the only ones fighting now.

The MNLF cadres are still very much there. The Islamic Command

Council is newly-formed but composed of former MNLF commanders. The

MNLF-Reformists can regroup anytime. There are still thousands of

armed Moros simply waiting for the most opportune time.

An all-out war against the MILF is indeed ill-advised because the

repercussions might be far worse. An all-out war between the AFP

and the MILF will surely expand to an all-out war between the AFP

and all Moro armed groups, which could very well escalate into a

full-scale civil war between the Moros and the Indios.

Time for Peace

Wars will only bring more wars. The Bangsa Moro enjoys the

inalienable right of self-determination. The 1966 Covenant on Civil

and Political Rights and Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural

Rights of the United Nations states:

"All peoples have the right of self-determination. By

virtue of that right they freely determine their political status

and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development."

It is high time that the Bangsa Moro be asked on what it really

wants. Does it want to remain in the present set-up? Do the Moros

prefer an autonomous region within the Republic? Do they want a

federal form of government? Or do they want independence? A clean

and honest referendum can give the answer, and everyone should

abide by the outcome.

Social Impact of the Present Conflict

The present conflict has already shown the negative impacts on the

communities. The degree of intolerance by both communities towards

each other has dramatically increased. The popularity of an â

€œall-out war” policy among the Christian population is evident as

shown by the surge in the popularity rating of President Estrada.

A more serious effect is the apparent success of the Abu Sayyaf and

the apparent failure of the MILF. This means that more Moros would

now be inclined to go the way of terrorism instead of a semi-

conventional warfare as practiced by the MILF.

But there are interesting effects, too. Many Christian

intellectuals are now seeing the practicality in Moro separatism.

More Moro wars would create greater havoc on the economy of the

whole country. Dan Mariano, Executive Editor of the Philippine Post

wrote in his column of May 13, 2000 the ff.:

If only they would be honest about it, the ordinary

Filipinos ”the so-called Christians” feel little kinship and

affinity for those whom they perfunctorily refer to as "Muslim

brothers." There is a great deal of discrimination and prejudice

against the Moros that is expressed officially, as in the

disenfranchisement of entire Muslim communities from the body

politic, and unofficially, as in chauvinistic jokes that portray

Moros as crude, opportunistic yokels.

The Moros are a people that have been set apart from the

Filipino nation by history, faith and culture. Their integration

into the Philippine Republic was a fabrication of colonialism. The

creation of the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao merely

acknowledged this fact, but it did not go far enough to rectify a

centuries-old mistake.

The creation of a homeland that the Moros can truly call

their own is the only intelligent solution to the Mindanao problem.

When this comes to pass, only then can Filipinos and Moros learn to

live in peace — as good neighbors.

================================================================

Speech delivered by Datu Jamal Ashley Abbas at the University of

the Philippines in Los Banos on 5 Sept. 2000

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

BLAIR, EMMA HELEN and James Robertson (eds.) The Philippine

Islands, 1493-1898 , Cleveland: 1904

DERY, LUIS CAMARA The Kris in Philippine History: A Study of the

Impact of Anti-Colonial Resistance, 1571-1896 self-published : 1997

HURLEY, VIC Swish of the Cross, The Story of the Moros, E.P. Dutton

& Co., USA: 1936

GEORGE, T.J.S. Revolt in Mindanao: The Rise of Islam in Philippine

Politics, Oxford Univ. Press, Kuala Lumpur: 1980

GOWING, PETER G. Mandate in Moroland: The American Government of

Muslim Filipinos 1899-1920, UP Press, Q.C.: 1977

JUBAIR, SALAH A Nation Under Endless Tyranny, 2nd ed., Lahore: 1997

LAARHOVEN, RUURDJE Triumph of Moro Diplomacy, The Maguindanao

Sultanate in the 17th Century, New Day, Q.C.: 1989

MAJUL, CESAR ADIB Muslims in the Philippines, 3rd edition, UP

Press, Q.C.: 1999

MAN, CHE W. K. Muslim Separatism: The Moros of Southern Philippines

and the Malays of Southern Thailand, Ateneo de Manila Press, Q.C.:

1990

NARDIN, DENIS France and the Philippines: From the Beginning to the

End of the Spanish Regime, translated by Ma. Theresa Cruz, National

Historical Institute: 1989

PIGAFETTA, ANTONIO Magellan's Voyage Around The World, 1906 edition

RASUL, JAINAL D. The Philippine Muslims: Struggle for Identity,

Nueva Press, Manila: 1970

SALEEBY, NAJEEB MITRY Studies in Moro History, Law and Religion,

Manila: 1905

TAN, SAMUEL K. The Filipino Muslim Armed Struggle 1900-1972,

Filipinas Foundation, Q.C. 1977

THOMAS, RALPH Muslim But Filipino: The Integration of Philippine

Muslims, 1917-1946, PhD dissertation GSAS, Univ. of Pennsylvania:

1971
-------END OF COPIED ARTICLE-------